Down to Earth But Heavenly Minded

“And the Lord spake to Moses, saying, Take the Levites from among the children of Israel, and cleanse them. And thus shalt thou do to them, to cleanse them: Sprinkle water of purifying upon them, and let them shave all their flesh, and let them wash their clothes, and so make themselves clean. Then let them take a young bullock with his meat offering, even fine flour mingled with oil; and another young bullock shalt thou take for a sin offering. And thou shalt bring the Levites before the tabernacle of the congregation: and thou shalt gather the whole assembly of the children of Israel together: and thou shalt bring the Levites before the Lord: and the children of Israel shall put their hands upon the Levites: and Aaron shall offer the Levites before the Lord for an offering of the children of Israel, that they may execute the service of the Lord. And the Levites shall lay their hands upon the heads of the bullocks: and thou shalt offer the one for a sin offering, and the other for a burnt offering, to the Lord, to make an atonement for the Levites. And thou shalt set the Levites before Aaron, and before his sons, and offer them for an offering to the Lord. Thus shalt thou separate the Levites from among the children of Israel: and the Levites shall be Mine.”

This passage furnishes us with a very rich and blessed branch of our interesting subject. We were enabled to see, in looking at Levi by nature, that such was his character that God would have no fellowship with him whatever, and that, so far as Levi was concerned, he should abide forever in his own habitation, in company with the “instruments of cruelty” which were therein. But God will not leave him there, and therefore God must Himself provide the remedy — God Himself must cleanse this self-willed, cruel and fierce man. And here we are invited to recall a thought which occurred to the mind in the opening of this paper, viz., that man’s sin must ever be brought into the presence of God’s grace. Levi had nothing else to look to; his sin was such as to preclude every thought of human remedy; the law condemned Levi’s nature; and God had pronounced him unfit for His presence. And what, then, had Levi to do? Could he set himself with heart and soul to keep the law? Impossible: the law had not only condemned his works, but pronounced the curse of God upon his very nature. The law said, “Thou shalt do no murder” and having said this, it added, “Cursed is every one that continues not in all things that are written in the book of the law, to do them.” But Levi had murder in his nature, therefore Levi’s nature was cursed.

What, then, could Levi do? Might he not cast himself over upon the mercy of God with the hope that He would deal lightly with his sins? No; by no means: God had given forth His solemn and unalterable decree, “O my soul, come not thou into their secret”; God could not come into a habitation wherein were “instruments of cruelty.”

Thus, then, Levi was completely shut up without a single means of escape; the law nailed him down to this one point, “Answer my demands.” And all that Levi had towards the discharge of these demands was, “anger, fierceness, murder, self-will, cruelty,” etc.: poor resources, alas! Nor would the law of God enter into any composition with the sinner; it should have “the uttermost farthing,” or else the word was, “cursed art thou.” Therefore Levi, as a man alive in the flesh, or, in other words, Levi, as seeking to get life through the law, was judged, condemned, and set aside, and it only remained for him to take thus the place of one dead, in order that God might in grace quicken him into new life, which God was ready and willing to do, and which, as we shall see, He graciously did, according to His own marvellous thoughts, and in His own way.

{The reader will, of course, bear in mind that what is stated about Levi in this paper is to be regarded as typical of that which the believer now knows in reality through the Holy Ghost.}

Levi, then, had just to see himself as one that was, in God’s account, dead, as we read “for they [i.e., the Levites] are wholly given to Me from among the children of Israel; instead of such as open every womb, even instead of the first-born of all the children of Israel, have I taken them to Me: for all the first-born of the children of Israel are Mine both man and beast: on the day that I smote every first-born in the land of Egypt, I sanctified them for Myself; and I have taken the Levites for all the first-born of the children of Israel.” (Numbers 8:16-18)

The Lord passed through the land of Egypt with the sword of justice unsheathed, to smite all the first-born, nor would Israel’s first-born have escaped, had not the sword fallen upon the neck of the spotless victim and thus, as some one has beautifully observed, “There was death in every house, not only in the houses of the Egyptians, but also in those of the Israelites: in the former, it was the death of Egypt’s first-born; in the latter, the death of God’s LAMB.”

The Levites, then, were taken instead of those upon whom the sword of the destroying angel should have fallen; or, in other words, the Levites were, typically a dead and risen people, and thus were no longer looked at in the circumstances of nature, but of new life through grace, in which they were placed by God Himself. And here let me observe that this is the path which every sinner must travel if he would know experimentally anything of Levi’s after history. There is no other way in which to escape from the judgement of the law on the one hand, or from the horrid workings of indwelling corruption on the other, than simply to see ourselves “dead” to both, and “alive to God through Jesus Christ.” “How shall we,” says the apostle, “that are dead to sin live any longer therein? Know ye not that so many of us as were baptised into Jesus Christ were baptised into His death? Therefore we are buried with Him by baptism into death; that, like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.” (Romans 6:2-4) And, again, “Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ, that ye should be married to another, even to Him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit to God.” (Romans 7:4) But not only are death and resurrection the only possible means by which a sinner can escape the condemnation of the law and the tyrannical sway of sin, they are also the only means by which he can acceptably serve God. The flesh, or carnal mind, cannot serve God, for it is not subject to His law, neither indeed can be; therefore we infer that the sources of that life by which we can serve God are not to be found in the flesh, but only in union with the Lord Jesus in resurrection. “If a man abide not in Me, he is cast forth as a branch and is withered.” (John 15:6) Consequently, when God would bring Levi into a place of nearness and service to Himself, He shows him to us as passing through those circumstances which, in the clearest manner, illustrate death and resurrection; for they are taken instead of those that were as dead, but who escaped through the death of the lamb: and then having thus passed through the circumstances of death, they are told in chapter 8 to “put off the old man and put on the new” for that is the meaning of the “washing of water,” and “shaving of the flesh,” etc. This is in full keeping with what the apostle states to his son Titus: “For we ourselves also were sometime foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another. But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost, which He shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour.” (Titus 3:3-6)

But in order that we may have a clearer and more comprehensive view of the ground upon which the Levites stood before God, I would refer, in as brief and concise a manner as I can, to the offerings connected with their consecration: these were the burnt offering, the meat offering, and the sin offering; all, as we shall see, showing out the Lord Jesus Christ in His varied aspects. See note. And first, the burnt offering: the principles unfolded in this offering are brought out in the first chapter of Leviticus, where we read, “If his offering be a burnt sacrifice of the herd, let him offer a male without blemish: he shall offer it of his own voluntary will at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the Lord.” (verse 3)

{Note:It may be well just to observe here that in considering the offerings above referred to I have merely looked at them with reference to the question of Levi’s history. End of note.}

Here, then, is something real for the soul to feed on and rejoice in. We have in the burnt offering the Lord Jesus Christ, in all His fullness and perfections, as offering Himself “without spot to God,” and also as accepted before God for us. In this He was found to be “a male without blemish”; so much so, that the One in whose sight the very heavens are not clean, could say, “In whom I am well pleased”: and again, “Mine elect, in whom My soul delights.”

But further, this unblemished offering presents Himself voluntarily at the door of the tabernacle. “No man,” says the Lord Jesus, speaking of His life, “takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself: I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again: this commandment have I received of My Father.” And truly, in tracing the way of the blessed Jesus through this defiled world, we can recognise this feature of the burnt offering in a very striking manner. From first to last His course was marked with all the steadiness and divine uninterrupted calmness of true devotedness to God. The billows of dark and fierce temptation might roll and toss themselves with a range and fury which would have crushed one less than God. The devil might stir up all his deadly malice against Him; man might display all his enmity — enmity which could only be outdone by the eternal friendship of this devoted One. His disciples, moreover, may refuse to “watch with Him one hour.” Death may arm himself with all his ghastly terrors, and pour out a cup mixed with hell’s bitterest ingredients; and further, display his deadly sting in all its infernal keenness and power to wound. The grave may conjure up all its unutterable horrors to make one grand struggle for “victory,” but all in vain. The answer of this unblemished voluntary offering to all these was, “My meat and My drink is to do the will of Him that sent Me, and to finish His work.” He had His eye upon one object, and that was “the joy that was set before Him.” He looked forward to the moment when He would be able to draw forth from the inexhaustible treasuries of eternal love the rich and princely fruits of His hard-bought victory, and pour them forth in divine profusion upon the “travail of His soul”; even the Church, which He loved, and purchased with His own precious blood. He eagerly anticipated “the morning without clouds,” when, surrounded by the myriads of His ransomed brethren, He will sound forth in everlasting strains the mighty answer to all the foul aspersions of the enemy as to the love of God toward the sinner. All these attractions, I say, He had before Him, and therefore He marched onward in the greatness of His strength; He steadfastly set His face to go to Jerusalem.” Lord Jesus Christ, invigorate our poor cold hearts to sound forth the eternal honours of Thine adorable name; and may our lives be more and more the decided evidence of our hearts — love to Thee, for “Thou alone art worthy!” All this is surely most blessed for us; but, blessed as it is, it is not all; there are other strokes from the pencil of the Divine Artist, calculated, in the highest degree, to captivate our spiritual tastes, yea, more, to feed our souls. “He shall put his hand upon the head of the burnt offering; and it shall be accepted for him, to make atonement for him.” (verse 4) Here, then, is grace! Levi, the self-willed, cruel, fierce, and blood-shedding Levi, is accepted in all the perfectness and acceptableness of this “unblemished male” before God: whatever of excellency, whatever of value, whatever of purity, God beheld in this offering, that did He likewise behold in Levi as “accepted in the offering.” Thus, look at Levi apart from the offering, and you will find him such that God could not come into his assembly: but look at him as in the offering, and you find him, through grace, as pure and as perfect as the offering itself. Nothing could surpass this most excellent grace. The grace that could take up a sinner from such a pit of corruption as that in which Levi lay grovelling, and lead him into such high elevation, deserves the highest note of praise; and, blessed be God, it shall, ere long, have it from all who, like Levi, have felt its sacred power.

However, we must not enter too minutely into the detail of this burnt offering, and there are just two points further to which I will refer. The first is presented to us in verse 6: “And he shall flay the burnt offering, and cut it into his pieces.” Here we see at once to what a process of strict, jealous and uncompromising scrutiny the Lord Jesus exposed Himself in offering Himself before God. It was not enough that the animal should be APPARENTLY “without blemish,” for the skin, or outward surface, might look very well, and at the same time the offering be not at all fit for God’s altar; therefore the outward surface must be removed, in order that this offering may be examined in all its sinews, joints and veins, and thus be found, as to the springs of action, the structure of his frame, and the source and channels of the life that animated him, a perfectly unblemished offering. But further, “he shall cut it into his pieces,” i.e., take the offering asunder, and examine its various parts, in order that it may not only form a perfect whole, but that each distinct joint may be found perfect. Thus, in whatever aspect we look at the Lord Jesus, we get divine perfection. He could say to God, “Thou hast tried Me, and shalt find nothing;” and God could answer, “I am well pleased.” He could say of the devil, “The prince of this world comes, and has nothing in Me;” and the devil could reply, “I know Thee, who thou art, the Holy One of God.” He could say to men, “Which of you convinces Me of sin?” and man could answer, “Truly this was a righteous man.” Thus, I say, our divine burnt offering, who voluntarily presented Himself at God’s altar, and there poured forth His most precious blood, was found, in every feature and in every aspect, pure and perfect in the very highest sense of the word, and confessed so by heaven, earth, and hell.

{Note: We may also observe, in the act of cutting the offering into his pieces, this important truth, that in whatever relationship of life we contemplate the Lord Jesus, we find the same unsullied perfection whether we consider Him as a public or as a private character, in one position or another, all is alike. Not so with man — here there must be failure in one way or another. If a man is a good public character, he may be the very plague of the family circle, and vice versa. And, surely, in all this we learn the glorious truth which shall shortly be owned by all created intelligences, that “He alone is worthy.” End of note.}

All, therefore, having been found pure, and fit for God’s altar, it becomes the happy place of Aaron’s sons to send up before God the sweet savour of this most acceptable offering, as we read: “And the sons of Aaron the priest shall put fire upon the altar, and lay the wood in order upon the altar, and lay the wood in order upon the fire. And the priests, Aaron’s sons, shall lay the parts, the head and the fat, in order upon the wood that is on the fire which is upon the altar. But his inwards and his legs shall he wash in water: and the priest shall burn all on the altar, to be a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, of a sweet savour to the Lord.” (verses 7-9)

The fat of the offering was God’s peculiar part; no one could with impunity touch that; yea, the punishment for so doing was the same as for eating blood; i.e., it was as wrong and as daringly presumptuous for a man to intrude upon God’s portion of the offering as it was for him to assume life in his own right, which latter was an open denial of the state of death and ruin in which he was by reason of sin. God, then, I say, claimed the fat. He alone could feed upon the inward excellency and peerless perfections of Jesus, just as in the case of the unmeasured ointment in Exodus 30, where we see, as well as in the above cited passage, that the infinite mind of God could alone appreciate the infinite value of Christ. But we find the head burnt in connection with the fat, showing us, I suppose, that both the hidden energies of the Lord Jesus and the seat of His understanding were equally suited to be a sweet savour to God. Lastly, the inwards and legs were washed and burned upon the altar, showing us that the secret thoughts, purposes and counsels of the Lord Jesus, as well as the outward development of these in His walk, were perfectly pure and fit for the altar: and, in connection with this last point, one cannot help dwelling with comfort upon the marvellous contrast between the Lord Jesus and His poor people. How often may our outward walk, typified by “the legs,” appear quite right in the eye of man, when, at the same time, perhaps, in the eye of God, our “inwards” may be full of gross impurity. But it is well for us that such was not the case with our great Head: in Him all was alike, for all was pure. May our hearts enter more and more fully, under the teaching of the Spirit, into the intrinsic excellency of the Lord Jesus; and may we be enabled daily, standing at the altar before God, to send up in His presence the savour of all this!

As to the meat offering, we need not enter minutely into it. It was composed, as we know, of that which sprang from the earth, and such as aptly shadowed out “the Man Christ Jesus”, the frankincense thereon marking the entire devotedness of all the actings of Christ’s human nature to God His Father. Nothing was done by Him to meet man’s eye, or man’s approbation; nothing was done to produce mere effect; no, all was directly before God. Whether we trace the footsteps of the Lord Jesus, while, for thirty years, He was subject to His parents at home; or while, for three years, He was engaged in public ministry amongst the Jews — all was alike: all showed forth the pure frankincense that marked Him, in all things, as God’s peculiar and devoted servant. We may observe further that this meat offering was baked with oil, and anointed with oil; thus showing forth, I suppose, the incarnate Son of God, who was first “conceived of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 1:20), and then “anointed with the Holy Ghost.” (Matthew 3:16; Acts 10:38)

We now come to speak of the sin offering, and may the Lord graciously refresh our spirits while dwelling for a little on the blessed principles unfolded therein. The sin offering is brought before us in Leviticus 4, from whence we may select one case for our present purpose. “If the priest that is anointed do sin, according to the sin of the people, then let him bring for his sin which he has sinned, a young bullock without blemish to the Lord for a sin offering. And he shall bring the bullock to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the Lord, and shall lay his hand upon the bullock’s head and kill the bullock before the Lord.” (verses 3-4)

The reader will, no doubt, observe a marked difference between the above passage and that in which the burnt offering was referred to; and the difference so far mainly consists in this, that in the last cited passage the words “voluntary will” are not found, and this was quite to be looked for. In the burnt offering we were enabled to recognise the Lord Jesus Christ offering Himself voluntarily before God, in which aspect of His blessed work He could say, “No man takes it [My life] from Me, I lay it down of Myself.” In other words, He offered Himself “of His own voluntary will at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the Lord.” But in the sin offering it is quite different: “He shall be brought” and “He shall be killed”, i.e., instead of coming, He shall be brought; and instead of laying down His life of Himself, His life shall be taken from Him. These, I say, are important distinctions, and such as arise from the very nature of the two offerings. In the burnt offering the Lord Jesus is seen offering Himself in all the unblemished perfectness which belonged to Him; and in this His soul had great delight, because He was presenting that before God which was so acceptable to Him. But in the sin offering the Lord Jesus is seen standing in connection with that which His pure and spotless soul must have deeply abhorred and keenly resented — abhorred and resented, indeed, in a way of which we cannot form the faintest idea. He is seen, in a word, as standing in connection with sin: yea, more, as “made sin.” (2 Corinthians 5:21) Thus it was that the prophet, through the Spirit, viewed Him when he said, “He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement of our peace was upon Him; and with His stripes we are healed. All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us all.” (Isaiah 53:5-6)

Now I believe that by looking at the two offerings in connection we get a very deep and wondrous view of sin’s dark and dreadful enormity in the sight of God: for sin in this point of view appears sinful just according to the measure of Christ’s perfectness in God’s account. If in the burnt offering we were enabled to see that such was the beauty and excellency of Christ that His whole man could go up before God as a sweet savour, and that God could “find nothing in Him” but perfection, as a necessary consequence then we must see in the sin offering the blackness and heinousness of sin, which could oblige God to hide His face from “His elect, in whom His soul delighted.”

This brings us to the next point connected with the sin offering, viz., “He shall lay his hand upon the bullock’s head” (verse 4). Here we have at once the secret of the deep and profound mystery of the three hours’ darkness.

It was before observed that God had to hide His face from the Lord Jesus on the cross, but how are we to account for such a mysterious circumstance? Simply by the words, “he (the sinner) shall lay his hand upon the bullock’s head.” If, in contemplating the burnt offering, we were struck by the fact that all the perfectness of the offering was communicated to the “fierce and cruel” Levi, so here we are called upon to adore the grace that devised the wondrous plan whereby that could be effected, which was by imputing to the offering all the sin and defilement of Levi, and dealing with the sin of Levi in the person of the sin offering, in order that Levi himself might be dealt with in the person of the burnt offering.

And all this, be it observed, is conveyed to us in the action of “the laying on of hands.” This action was performed in both cases; i.e., Levi laid his hands on the head of the burnt-offering, and Levi laid his hands on the head of the sin offering. As to the act, it was the same in each case; but oh, how different the results! they were, in a word, as different as life and death, Heaven and hell, sin and holiness. In fact, we cannot conceive a wider contrast than that which is observable in the results of this action, to all appearance the same in each case. We may, perhaps, be able to form some idea of it by considering that the act of imposition of hands was at once the imputation of sin to one “who knew no sin,” but was “holy, harmless, undefiled,” and whose very nature abhorred all sin. And, on the other hand, it was the imputation of perfect righteousness to one who was by nature “a cruel, fierce, and self-willed murderer”, see note, Furthermore, the act of imposition of hands obliged the One, who, from before all worlds dwelt in the bosom of the Father, to travel far away into the cold and barren regions of death and darkness, where the genial and life-giving rays of His Father’s countenance, which He alone could truly appreciate, had never penetrated; and standing upon the confines of which, He cried “If it be possible, let this cup pass from Me!” and again, when these gloomy regions, with their ten thousand unutterable horrors, burst upon His spotless soul, “My God, My God WHY HAST THOU forsaken Me?”  

{Note: I would observe here that in speaking of “the imputation of righteousness,” I by no means desire to be understood as giving any countenance to the prevailing theory of “the imputed righteousness of Christ.” Of this expression, so much in use in the theology of the present day, it would be sufficient to say that it is nowhere to be found in the oracles of God. I read of “the righteousness of God” (Romans 3 passim), and, moreover, of the imputation of righteousness (Romans 4:11), but never of “the righteousness of Christ.” It is true, we read of the Lord Jesus being “made of God to us righteousness” (Jeremiah 23:6), but these, passages do not support the above theory. I would further add that the moral effect of this idea will be found to be decidedly pernicious, because it of necessity supposes the believer as standing apart from the Lord Jesus, whereas the doctrine of Scripture is that the believer is “made the righteousness of God IN HIM.” (2 Corinthians 5:21) And again, “we are in Him that is true, even in His Son Jesus Christ.” (1 John 5:20) End of note.}

And, on the other hand, it enabled the one who dwelt in “the habitations of cruelty,” into whose “assembly” God could not come, to stand in the very blaze of the light of God’s throne. These considerations, I say, may perhaps assist our conceptions in some measure upon this astounding truth. Now, the apostle states the same truth in the didactic language of the New Testament when he says, “He [God] has made Him to be sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him.” (2 Corinthians 5:21) That is, He has made the One whose perfectness is seen in the burnt offering to be judged as sin, and treated as such in the sin offering in order that we, who deserved the treatment of the sin offering, might be created as accepted in the burnt offering.

I would also observe here that there is much force and value in the word “made:” it shows out most fully that righteousness was just as foreign to the nature of man as sin was to the nature of Christ. Man had no righteousness of his own, or in other words, he knew no righteousness, and therefore he had to be “made” righteousness. Christ “knew no sin,” and therefore had to be “made sin” in order that we might be made righteousness, even “the righteousness of God in Him.” But further, we learn from the passage to which we are referring that the Lord Jesus having been “made sin for us,” is not more real, not more true, not more palpable, than that the believer is “made righteousness in Him.”

If there be any truth or reality in the record concerning the cross and passion of the Lord Jesus, then, it is plain that the moment a soul acts in faith upon Christ in His death and resurrection, that moment he is accepted in all the acceptableness of Christ. His consciousness of this is, of course, quite another question: a truth, and the realisation of a truth, are quite distinct.

The measure of our realisation will be in proportion to the measure of our communion with God. If we are satisfied to move at a cold and heartless distance from God, our consciousness of the power and value of any truth will, as a consequence, be meagre and shallow: while, therefore, it is not to be forgotten that the root and source of all life and communion is the truth stated in the passage to which we are alluding, it is manifest that the more we walk in communion with Him who gives us the life, the more shall we enjoy both Himself and the life which He gives. Dear Christian reader, let us pray that the cross and passion of the Lord Jesus may sink so deeply into our hearts that we may have on the one hand such a view of the loathsomeness of sin as shall lead us to abhor it with a holy abhorrence “all the days of our life,” and on the other hand, such a view of the amazing love of God as shall constrain us “to live not to ourselves but to Him who died for us and rose again.”

Thus, then, we see that the laying on of hands shows forth nothing less than a change of places on the part of the sinner and the Saviour. The sinner was out of the favour of God: “O my soul, come not thou into their habitation.” The Saviour was in the favour of God, “daily His delight,” dwelling in His bosom from before all worlds. But the amazing plan of redemption shows us the Saviour out of the favour of God, and God forsaking Him, while at the same time a condemned malefactor is brought at once into the very presence of a loving and pardoning God. Amazing, deep, inconceivable, eternal love! unfathomable wisdom! love which soars far aloft above the most gigantic conception! wisdom which has written everlasting contempt upon all the power and base designs of the great enemy of God and man! For, ere Levi could be introduced into the enjoyment of the “covenant of life and peace” (Malachi 2:5), a spotless Victim must stand the shock of the king of terrors and all his thunders. But who is this Victim? We ask not, “Who is this King of glory?” but Who is this Victim? The answer to this question it is which gives to the plan of redemption its grandest and most divine characteristic. The Victim was none less than the Son of God Himself! Yes! here was love, here was wisdom. The Son of God had to stoop because man had exalted himself. And surely we may say, If God had not entered upon the work, all, all were lost, and that forever. No mere mortal could have entered into that dark scene where sin was being atoned for; no one but the Son of God could have sustained the weight which, in the garden and on the cross, rested on the shoulders of the “One that was mighty.” And here we might refer to the Lord’s language to His disciples when He was about to enter into conflict with the adversary: “Hereafter I will not talk much with you; for the prince of this world comes, and has nothing in Me” (John 14:30). Why could He not “talk much with them”? Because He was just going to enter upon the work of atonement, in which they could do nothing, because the prince of this world, had he come, would have had plenty in them, but then, the moment He, as it were, in spirit passes through that sorrowful hour, He says, “Arise, let us go hence”; i.e., although we could not move a single step in the achievement of the victory, yet we could enjoy the fruits of it; and not only so, but display the fruits of it in a life of service and fruit-bearing to God, which forms the subject of teaching in the next chapter.

Here, then, is what gives peace to the awakened conscience of the sinner. God Himself has done the work. God has triumphed over all man’s wickedness and rebellion, and now every soul who feels his need of pardon and peace can draw near in faith and holy confidence and reap the fruits of this wondrous triumph of grace and mercy.

And now, dear reader, if you have not as yet made these wondrous fruits your own; if you have not as yet cast the whole burden of your sins on God’s eternal love as seen in the cross, I ask you, Why do you stand aloof? Why do you doubt? Perhaps you feel the hardness of your heart, perhaps you are ready to say that you feel yourself even now unmoved by the contemplation of all the deep sorrow endured by the Son of God. Well, what of that? If it be a question of your guilt, you may go much farther than even this, for in that hour of which we have been speaking you stood unmoved, looked on with cold and heartless indifference, while all creation owned the wondrous fact. Yea, more, you yourself crucified the incarnate God, you spat in His face, and plunged your spear into His side. Do you shrink back and say, “Oh, not so bad!” I say it was the act of the human heart; and if you have a human heart, it was your act. But the Scriptures at once decide this point, for it is written, “For of a truth against Thy holy child Jesus, whom Thou hast anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the people of Israel, were gathered together.” (Acts 4:27) This passage, I say, proves that all the world were representatively around the cross. But why insist on this? Simply to show forth the riches of the grace of God, which can only be seen in all its effulgent lustre in the cross; and therein it is seen mounting far above all man’s sin and malignant rebellion; for when man, in the fiendish pride of his heart, could plunge his spear into the side of incarnate Deity, God’s cry was — BLOOD! and through that blood “remission of sins, beginning at Jerusalem.”Thus, where sin abounded, grace did much more abound,” and “grace REIGNS through righteousness by Jesus Christ our Lord.”

Enough, I trust, has been said to show the grounds upon which the Levites stood before God. These grounds were free and eternal grace — grace exercised toward them through the blood, which is the only channel through which grace can flow. Man has been found to be utterly ruined before God, and therefore it must be a question either of salvation through free grace, or eternal damnation; for by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh living be justified.” But then, while man is by nature utterly unfit to render anything like an acceptable righteousness or service to God, yet, when God gives us new life through grace, He, of course, looks for the development of that life. In other words, grace brings the soul into circumstances of responsibility and service, and it is as we meet those circumstances that God is glorified in us and our souls grow in the knowledge of God. Thus it was in the case of the leper: up to a certain point in his history he had nothing to do, the priest was the sole actor. But when the priest had done his part; when, by virtue of the blood which had been shed, he had pronounced him “clean,” the leper had then to begin to “wash himself.” (Leviticus 14:8) Now we shall find that the history of Levi develops all these principles most fully.

We have hitherto been engaged with Levi’s condition and character by nature and also the wondrous remedy devised by grace to meet him in his lost estate, and not only to save him from that estate but also to raise him up to an elevation which could never have entered into the heart of man, even into the very tabernacle of God. We shall now, with God’s blessing and grace, proceed to examine that high elevation to which we have referred, and also the service which it involved, as put before us in Numbers 3.